D.A.B. v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Our client was revoked after failing a breath test. She hired us to get her license back -- and we did, by using our scientific background to convince the judge that even though our client's alcohol concentration was reported to be over the 0.08 legal limit, the machine that tested her breath was too inaccurate to support the revocation.

We used our unmatched knowledge of breath testing to convince the judge to say that the current breath testing practices in Minnesota "present this Court with insufficient evidence to accurately evaluate these test results in comparison with the 0.08 legal threshold, requiring speculation and guesswork where precision and accuracy are mandated." 

After winning our client's license, we then turned around and got the DWI charges against her dismissed.